@article{Ettm{\"u}ller2012,
  author    = {Ettm{\"u}ller, Eliane Ursula},
  title     = {Caricature and Egypt's Revolution of 25 January 2011},
  journal   = {Zeithistorische Forschungen - Studies in Contemporary History},
  volume    = {9},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {ZZF - Centre for Contemporary History: Zeithistorische Forschungen},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  doi       = {10.14765/zzf.dok-1605},
  pages     = {138 -- 148},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Caricature can be defined as an art engag{\´e} which aims to transmit a social or political message. In order to achieve this goal, the satirical picture triggers an emotional reaction in the audience and guides it through a cathartic coming-of-awareness process. The feelings evoked by caricature must not necessarily be expressed through laughter; but they are a joyful or indignant shock reaction to gazing at something absurd. William A. Coupe, following Schiller, therefore defines the nature of caricature as the outcome of a dialectical struggle between the ideal and the real: 'This conflict of ideal and real may, however, be seen and expressed in two different ways, in an emotional and serious or in a humorous and jesting fashion.'},
  language  = {en}
}